Why must I, the purchaser, pay the transfer fees, but the seller can choose the attorney?
 
“I’m buying my first property. I’m quite nervous about everything 
and a friend of mine who is a conveyancer said she would help me with 
the transaction. However the seller is refusing and insisting that his 
attorneys must do the transfer. If I am the one paying the transfer 
fees, surely I should be able to nominate the attorney to do the 
transfer?”
As a rule of thumb our common law determines that a seller is the party 
entitled to nominate who the transferring attorney must be, given that 
the seller carries more risk than the purchaser. That said, nothing 
prohibits parties from agreeing that the purchaser can nominate the 
transferring attorney, although often in practice, the seller refuses to
 agree to such a condition and the purchaser then concedes for want of 
having the property.
Generally, it could be said that it makes more sense for the seller to 
nominate the transferring attorney as the purchaser is required to raise
 the purchase price, cover the transfer fees, meet suspensive conditions
 such as financing etc. and the seller would generally feel more 
protected by his attorney managing these important elements and ensure a
 speedy transaction and receipt of the purchase price. The transferring 
attorney has to ensure that the purchase price is secured and available 
and a purchaser’s attorney may be persuaded to rely upon assurances of 
his client that the money is available, with dire consequences for both 
purchaser and attorney, should this prove to be incorrect. In short, it 
is generally seen that the seller as the owner of the property to be 
transferred stands to lose more and therefore has a stronger claim to 
the appointment of the conveyancer.
Regardless, of who appoints the conveyancer, the conveyancer owes a duty
 of care to both parties and must represent both parties fairly, unless a
 dispute arises in which case the transferring attorney will be allowed 
to act on behalf of the party who nominated him. It remains open for 
parties to negotiate the appointment of the transferring attorney and 
include a clause to such effect in the contract of sale and good grounds
 may exist which supports the purchaser being entitled to appoint the 
transferring attorney. 
Comments
Post a Comment