Do I have to tell my insurer about my lapa?
 
“I recently added a thatched lapa to my house. I have an open braai 
under the lapa. With the recent bad winds some coals were blown into the
 thatch and started a fire. I lost the whole lapa and part of my house 
due to the fire. I lodged a claim correctly with my insurer who has now 
informed me that they are repudiating my claim because I never informed 
them of the lapa addition to my house. Can they do this?”
An insurance contract is an agreement like any other contract concluded 
between an insurer and an insured and can be described as a contract to 
reimburse the insured for loss suffered by an uncertain event which has 
been insured against.
Importantly, the insurer agrees to provide risk cover for a specified 
but uncertain risk and the insurer undertakes to pay a sum of money to 
an insured, based on the insurer’s calculation of the possibility of the
 uncertainty. Where the event has not been specified or the risk 
calculation compromised by events not disclosed to the insurer, the 
agreement to provide risk cover is compromised leading to a repudiation 
of an insured’s claim. 
In your situation the non-disclosure of the addition of a thatched lapa 
to your house, which is typically a fire hazard, and which was not 
disclosed to your insurance company, has lead to the repudiation of your
 claim due to such non-disclosure, even though your insurance may have 
provided for fire damage. 
To evaluate whether such repudiation is legal, our courts look at 
whether the information that was not disclosed to the insurer, is 
material or would have made a difference in the insurer’s decision to 
cover you at a specified premium or not. The question is therefore, if 
the insurer was aware of your thatched lapa addition, would they have 
entered into the agreement or established the premium at what it is, or 
would they have made it a requirement that for example firefighting 
equipment be held nearby. If the answer is that the insurer would 
probably not have undertaken to cover the risk or not done so without 
qualification or only done so at a different premium, the repudiation by
 the insurer will be valid. 
In our law, there is a general duty on any insured to prevent damage or 
risk, and it is therefore always better to be honest with the insurer 
upfront and also disclose anything that you suspect may increase your 
risk. 
If you feel that you have been unfairly treated by your insurer, you can
 lodge a complaint with your insurer. If this does not resolve your 
concerns you can also consider lodging a complaint with the insurance 
ombudsman or obtaining legal advice from an insurance specialist. 
Comments
Post a Comment